答案家

 找回密码
 立即注册
查看: 261|回复: 0

2018曲美他嗪联合无缝隙护理干预对老年冠心病患者心绞痛的影响

[复制链接]

1

主题

1

帖子

41

积分

幼儿园

Rank: 1

积分
41
发表于 2018-8-14 17:36:28 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
  【摘要】 目的 探讨曲美他嗪联合无缝隙护理干预对老年冠心病患者心绞痛的影响。方法 100例老年冠心病患者, 随机分为试验组和对照组, 各50例。所有患者均采用曲美他嗪治疗, 对照组采取常规护理, ?验组在对照组基础上采取无缝隙护理干预, 采用西雅图心绞痛量表(SAQ)对两组患者的机体状态和生活质量[心绞痛发作情况(AF)、心绞痛稳定状态(AS)、躯体活动受限程度(PL)、疾病认知程度(DP)和治疗满意程度(TS)]进行比较。结果 试验组AF(93.24±12.57)分、AS(89.23±11.07)分、PL(78.23±11.99)分、DP(72.36±11.78)分、TS(78.56±10.88)分均优于对照组的(85.12±12.55)、(78.25±11.97)、(67.23±12.17)、(58.25±12.00)、(67.12±10.78)分, 差异有统计学意义(P /6/view-10687233.htm
  【关键词】 曲美他嗪;无缝隙护理干预;老年冠心病
  DOI:10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2018.11.087
  【Abstract】 Objective To discuss the effect of trimetazidine combined with non-break nursing intervention on angina pectoris in elderly patients with coronary heart disease. Methods A total of 100 elderly patients with coronary heart disease were randomly divided into experimental group and control group, with 50 cases in each group. All patients was treated with trimetazidine, and the control group received conventional nursing, while the experimental group received on-break nursing intervention on the basis of the control group. The Seattle angina questionnaire (SAQ) was used to compare the body condition and quality of life [angina frequency (AF), anginal stability (AS), physical limitation (PL), disease perception (DP) and treatment satisfaction (TS)] between the two groups. Results The experimental group had obviously better AF as (93.24±12.57) points, AS as (89.23±11.07) points, PL as (78.23±11.99) points, DP as (72.36±11.78) points, TS as (78.56±10.88) points than (85.12±12.55), (78.25±11.97), (67.23±12.17), (58.25±12.00), and (67.12±10.78) points in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P医学界的重点。无缝隙护理是指患者从入院到出院阶段的一体化护理过程[1]。让患者在在院期间有着完整的护理服务。作者从2016年6月起对本科室老年冠心病心绞痛患者采取无缝隙护理, 疗效显著, 报告如下。 1 资料与方法
  1. 1 一般资料 选取2016年6月~2017年6月在大连市友谊医院综合二病房老年冠心病患者100例, 随机分为试验组和对照组, 各50例。对照组中男25例, 女25例, 年龄65~85岁, 平均年龄(75.0±4.0)岁。试验组中男24例, 女26例, 年龄65~84岁, 平均年龄(74.0±4.1)岁。两组患者年龄、性别等一般资料比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05), 具有可比性。纳入标准:①符合国际心脏病学会诊断标准;②精神正常可以自主回答问题;③生命体征稳定;④患者自愿参加, 签署知情同意书。排除标准:①合并其他恶性肿瘤及合并有其他器官严重疾病;②处于急性感染期的患者;③不愿意参加的患者。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

CopyRight(c)2016 www.daanjia.com All Rights Reserved. 本站部份资源由网友发布上传提供,如果侵犯了您的版权,请来信告知,我们将在5个工作日内处理。
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表