答案家

 找回密码
 立即注册
查看: 228|回复: 0

2018桡骨远端骨折手术治疗与保守治疗的临床对照研究分析

[复制链接]

1

主题

1

帖子

41

积分

幼儿园

Rank: 1

积分
41
发表于 2018-8-15 12:06:06 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
  [摘要] 目的 探讨桡骨远端骨折手术治疗与保守治疗的临床对照研究分析。方法 方便选取从2011年3月―2017年8月?锕窃抖斯钦刍颊?50例,随机分为常规组与观察组,25例/组。常规组患者采取保守治疗,观察组患者采取手术治疗,对比2组患者治疗优良率。结果 2组患者采取不同治疗方法后,采用保守治疗的常规组患者治疗有效率为72%,采用手术治疗的观察组患者治疗有效率为92%,2组比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05);而C型骨折评分,常规组为(27.86±1.76)分,观察组为(33.49±2.30)分,差异有统计学意义(P /6/view-10744782.htm
  [关键词] 桡骨远端骨折;手术治疗;保守治疗;临床分析
  [中图分类号] R5 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2017)10(b)-0101-03
  [Abstract] Objective This paper tries to investigate the clinical and comparative study of surgical treatment and conservative treatment of distal radius fracture. Methods 50 cases of distal radius fractures from March 2011 to August 2017 were convenient selected and randomly divided into the conventional group and the observation group, with 25 cases in each group. The patients in the conventional group were treated conservatively, and the patients in the observation group were treated by surgery. The excellent rate of treatment was compared between the two groups. Results After different treatment methods of two groups of patients, the effective rate of conservative treatment of conventional group was 72%, the effective rate of operation treatment of patients in the observation group was 92%, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P0.05); as for the type C fracture score, the conventional group was (27.86±1.76)points, the observation group was (33.49±2.30)points, the difference was statistically significant(P0.05),具有可比性。     1.2 方法
  常规组患者采取保守治疗,临床上保守治疗即为传统的手法复位并加以石膏固定[3]。首先,患者在复位时要保证周围环境洁净、明亮,并根据患者骨折部位为患者塑造固定使用的夹板;其次,对患者进行局部麻醉,采用反折手法复位;然后,对复位后的部位进行固定,固定材料可选用石膏或者夹板;最后,患者在治疗1个月后,拆掉固定工具,并采用X线复查,鼓励患者积极进行关节锻炼。
  观察组患者采取手术治疗,具体实施内容如下:对患者采取克氏针固定,首先,在桡骨远端背侧轴线处做一个切口,放置克氏针[4];其次,将桡骨骨折位置与掌倾角采用牵引法和撬拔法复位;然后,将克氏针穿透近端对侧的皮质,固定桡骨复位后的位置与角度,偏角额采用撬拔法复位,对桡骨茎突一侧放置克氏针,克氏针要放置在偏角固定位置,穿透近端的对侧皮质;最后,在术后1个月后拔掉克氏针,并进行腕关节康复训练。
  1.3 疗效判定
  分为显效和有效。显效:患者在治疗后,患者的桡关节及骨折处已痊愈,各项指标恢复正常;有效:部分患者在治疗仍处于恢复阶段,但已有显著疗效,桡腕及桡尺关节处恢复活动力,并在治疗下逐渐恢复正常,总有效率=显效+有效/总例数×100%。对比2组不良反应发生情况。
  1.4 统计方法
  采用SPSS19.0统计学软件对数据进行分析处理,计量资料以均数±标准差(x±s)表示,采用t检验,计数资料以率(%)表示,采用χ2检验,P0.05),患者C型骨折PRWE腕关节疼痛评分比较,常规组为(27.86±1.76)分,观察组为(33.49±2.34)分,差异有统计学意义(P参考文献]
  [1] 杨晓莉.中医临床护理路径在桡骨远端骨折患者中的应用[J].光明中医,2017,21(14):2107-2108.
  [2] 汪东,黄环宇,鞠均海,等.解剖型钢板和锁定钢板在胫骨远端Pilon骨折关节面解剖复位中的临床效果分析[J].中外医学研究,2016,14(36):1-2.
  [3] 林子涛,陈其进,谢嘉禧.不同手术方法治疗桡骨远端关节内粉碎性骨折的疗效[J].牡丹江医学院学报,2017,38(3):75-76.
  [4] 戚晓阳,陈志达,吴进,等.桡骨远端骨折治疗的研究进展[J]. 山东医药,2017,57(16):99-102.
  [5] 王文华.比较手术与石膏外固定治疗桡骨远端不稳定性骨折疗效[J].中外医疗,2016,35(20):52-53.
  [6] 许家轩.手术与石膏外固定治疗桡骨远端不稳定骨折效果对照研究[J]. 临床医药文献电子杂志,2016,3(54):10691-10692.
  [7] Norma J,MacIntyre,Neha Dewan. Epidemiology of Distal Radius Fractures and Factors Predicting Risk and Prognosis[J]. Journal of Hand Therapy,2016,29(2):136-145.
  [8] Benjamin Bockmann,Can Budak,Jens Figiel,et al.Is there a benefit of proximal locking screws in osteoporotic distal radius fractures-A biomechanical study[J]. Injury,2016,47(8):1631-1635.
  (收稿日期:2017-09-17)
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

CopyRight(c)2016 www.daanjia.com All Rights Reserved. 本站部份资源由网友发布上传提供,如果侵犯了您的版权,请来信告知,我们将在5个工作日内处理。
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表